1968 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1960 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1968 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Chevrolet Camaro | 1960 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | R 360 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1960 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 16 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 1770 mm |