1968 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1967 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1968 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Bluebird would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Chevrolet Camaro | 1967 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Camaro | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1968 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2390 mm |