1968 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1986 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1986 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Chevrolet Camaro (155 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (83 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 482 kg more than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Chevrolet Camaro (320 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1968 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Chevrolet Camaro | 1986 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Camaro | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1968 | 1986 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4093 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.4 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.7 mm | 71.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1402 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 57 L |