1968 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1994 Suzuki Vitara
To start off, 1994 Suzuki Vitara is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher.
Because 1994 Suzuki Vitara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Suzuki Vitara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Chevrolet Camaro | 1994 Suzuki Vitara | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Camaro | Vitara |
Year Released | 1968 | 1994 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2210 mm |