1968 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Chevrolet Camaro | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3010 mm |