1968 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 1990 Toyota MR2
To start off, 1990 Toyota MR2 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1990 Toyota MR2. (135 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 1990 Toyota MR2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 495 kg more than 1990 Toyota MR2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Chevrolet Caprice | 1990 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Caprice | MR2 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1990 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 6476 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 70 L |