1968 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 1998 Peugeot Tulip
To start off, 1998 Peugeot Tulip is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 790 kg more than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Peugeot Tulip, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Chevrolet Caprice | 1998 Peugeot Tulip | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Peugeot |
| Model | Caprice | Tulip |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6476 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 880 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 45 L |
