1968 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2006 Fiat Palio II
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (72 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Because 1968 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Palio II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Chevrolet Caprice | 2006 Fiat Palio II | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Caprice | Palio II |
Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6476 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 54 L |