1968 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2009 Ford E-250
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2009 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 704 kg more than 2009 Ford E-250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Chevrolet Caprice | 2009 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Caprice | E-250 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6476 cc | 4606 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 5520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 2120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 132 L |
