1968 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,768 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle (140 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle weights approximately 331 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle (298 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Chevrolet Chevelle | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Chevelle | 2000 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3768 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.4 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1501 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 64 L |