1968 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 2004 Ford E-150
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle. (140 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 626 kg more than 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle. (298 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Chevrolet Chevelle | 2004 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Chevelle | E-150 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3768 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1501 kg | 2127 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 132 L |