1968 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 2005 Land Rover Defender
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Defender is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. At 3,768 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Defender weights approximately 557 kg more than 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle.
Because 2005 Land Rover Defender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Defender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Defender (300 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle. (298 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2005 Land Rover Defender will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Chevrolet Chevelle | 2005 Land Rover Defender | |
Make | Chevrolet | Land Rover |
Model | Chevelle | Defender |
Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3768 cc | 2498 cc |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.4 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 19.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1501 kg | 2058 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 75 L |