1968 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. At 3,768 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle. (140 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 9 kg more than 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle (298 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (213 Nm). This means 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Chevrolet Chevelle | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Chevelle | Outlander |
Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3768 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 213 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98.4 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1501 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 59 L |