1968 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle. (140 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 345 kg more than 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle. (298 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Chevelle | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3768 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 382 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.4 mm | 94.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1501 kg | 1846 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 87 L |
