1968 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 2009 Citroen C8

To start off, 2009 Citroen C8 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. At 3,768 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C8 (156 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle. (140 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C8 should accelerate faster than 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen C8 weights approximately 149 kg more than 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C8, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle (298 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C8. (217 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C8.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Chevrolet Chevelle 2009 Citroen C8
Make Chevrolet Citroen
Model Chevelle C8
Year Released 1968 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3768 cc 2230 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 140 HP 156 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5650 RPM
Torque 298 Nm 217 Nm
Torque RPM 1600 RPM 3900 RPM
Engine Bore Size 98.4 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 82.6 mm 96 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 11.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1501 kg 1650 kg
Vehicle Length 5110 mm 4730 mm
Vehicle Width 1930 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1760 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2830 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 80 L