1968 Chevrolet Corvair vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1968 Chevrolet Corvair is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,375 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Chevrolet Corvair is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Chevrolet Corvair (102 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Chevrolet Corvair should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 36 kg more than 1968 Chevrolet Corvair.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Chevrolet Corvair (182 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1968 Chevrolet Corvair will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Chevrolet Corvair | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | Corvair | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 2375 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 182 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 64 L |
