1968 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Chevrolet Corvette (350 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. (197 HP @ 7500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Chevrolet Corvette | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Corvette | FTO |
Year Released | 1968 | 1994 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5354 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 78.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2510 mm |