1968 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1968 Chevrolet Corvette is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Chevrolet Corvette. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 327 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Chevrolet Corvette. (488 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Chevrolet Corvette.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Chevrolet Corvette | 2000 Holden HRT | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Corvette | HRT |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5354 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 488 Nm | 815 Nm |
Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |