1968 Chevrolet Nova vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Chevrolet Nova weights approximately 180 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Because 1968 Chevrolet Nova is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Chevrolet Nova. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Chevrolet Nova | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Nova | RX-01 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2507 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2350 mm |