1968 Chevrolet Nova vs. 1996 Toyota Cresta
To start off, 1996 Toyota Cresta is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Chevrolet Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota Cresta weights approximately 150 kg more than 1968 Chevrolet Nova.
Because 1996 Toyota Cresta is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Chevrolet Nova. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Cresta will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Chevrolet Nova | 1996 Toyota Cresta | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Nova | Cresta |
Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2507 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2740 mm |