1968 Chevrolet Nova vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Chevrolet Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Chevrolet Nova (165 HP) has 95 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Chevrolet Nova should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Chevrolet Nova weights approximately 820 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Chevrolet Nova (388 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 286 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1968 Chevrolet Nova will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Chevrolet Nova 2002 MCC Crossblade
Make Chevrolet MCC
Model Nova Crossblade
Year Released 1968 2002
Engine Size 5733 cc 599 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 165 HP 70 HP
Torque 388 Nm 102 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 3210 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1560 kg 740 kg
Vehicle Length 4820 mm 2630 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 1810 mm