1968 Chevrolet Nova vs. 2003 Acura RL
To start off, 2003 Acura RL is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura RL weights approximately 395 kg more than 1968 Chevrolet Nova.
Because 1968 Chevrolet Nova is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Chevrolet Nova. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Acura RL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Chevrolet Nova | 2003 Acura RL | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Acura |
| Model | Nova | RL |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2507 cc | 3472 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2920 mm |
