1968 Chevrolet Nova vs. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1235 kg more than 1968 Chevrolet Nova.
Because 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Chevrolet Nova. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Chevrolet Nova | 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Chevrolet | Land Rover |
Model | Nova | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2507 cc | 4396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 2515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2890 mm |