1968 Chevrolet Nova vs. 2011 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2011 Holden Cruze is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 5,025 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Chevrolet Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1968 Chevrolet Nova. (130 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1968 Chevrolet Nova.
Because 1968 Chevrolet Nova is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Chevrolet Nova. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Chevrolet Nova (318 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Cruze. (176 Nm). This means 1968 Chevrolet Nova will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Chevrolet Nova | 2011 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Nova | Cruze |
Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5025 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 318 Nm | 176 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2685 mm |