1968 Chevrolet Nova vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 5,025 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Chevrolet Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Chevrolet Nova weights approximately 39 kg more than 2011 Volvo C30.
Because 1968 Chevrolet Nova is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Chevrolet Nova. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C30 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Chevrolet Nova. (318 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2011 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Chevrolet Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Chevrolet Nova | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Nova | C30 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5025 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 318 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2639 mm |