1968 Chevrolet Nova vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Chevrolet Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 875 kg more than 1968 Chevrolet Nova.
Because 2012 Volvo XC90 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Chevrolet Nova. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Chevrolet Nova | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Nova | XC90 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2507 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2860 mm |