1968 Citroen 2CV vs. 1954 Rover P4
To start off, 1968 Citroen 2CV is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,103 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Rover P4 (74 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1968 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Rover P4 should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Rover P4 weights approximately 830 kg more than 1968 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Rover P4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Rover P4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen 2CV | 1954 Rover P4 | |
Make | Citroen | Rover |
Model | 2CV | P4 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2103 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 52 L |