1968 Citroen 2CV vs. 1974 Mercury Comet
To start off, 1974 Mercury Comet is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,272 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mercury Comet (83 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1968 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Mercury Comet weights approximately 660 kg more than 1968 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen 2CV | 1974 Mercury Comet | |
Make | Citroen | Mercury |
Model | 2CV | Comet |
Year Released | 1968 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 3272 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2630 mm |