1968 Citroen 2CV vs. 1982 Talbot Samba
To start off, 1982 Talbot Samba is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,219 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Talbot Samba is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Talbot Samba (90 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1968 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Talbot Samba should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Talbot Samba weights approximately 226 kg more than 1968 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen 2CV | 1982 Talbot Samba | |
Make | Citroen | Talbot |
Model | 2CV | Samba |
Year Released | 1968 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 1219 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 90 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 786 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 40 L |