1968 Citroen 2CV vs. 1994 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1994 Ford Tempo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Tempo (134 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1968 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Tempo weights approximately 635 kg more than 1968 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen 2CV | 1994 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | 2CV | Tempo |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 2986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2540 mm |
