1968 Citroen 2CV vs. 2002 Kia Optima
To start off, 2002 Kia Optima is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Kia Optima (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1968 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Optima weights approximately 872 kg more than 1968 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen 2CV | 2002 Kia Optima | |
Make | Citroen | Kia |
Model | 2CV | Optima |
Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1432 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2710 mm |