1968 Citroen 2CV vs. 2002 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 657 cc (3 cylinders), 2002 Mitsubishi eK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mitsubishi eK weights approximately 230 kg more than 1968 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mitsubishi eK has automatic transmission and 1968 Citroen 2CV has manual transmission. 1968 Citroen 2CV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mitsubishi eK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen 2CV | 2002 Mitsubishi eK | |
| Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 2CV | eK |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2350 mm |
