1968 Citroen 2CV vs. 2005 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2005 MCC ForTwo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 698 cc (3 cylinders), 2005 MCC ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC ForTwo (49 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1968 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 MCC ForTwo weights approximately 170 kg more than 1968 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 MCC ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen 2CV | 2005 MCC ForTwo | |
Make | Citroen | MCC |
Model | 2CV | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 1810 mm |