1968 Citroen 2CV vs. 2005 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2005 Toyota Celica is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Celica (141 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1968 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Celica weights approximately 615 kg more than 1968 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen 2CV | 2005 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | 2CV | Celica |
Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 55 L |