1968 Citroen 2CV vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,488 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1968 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 565 kg more than 1968 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1968 Citroen 2CV has manual transmission. 1968 Citroen 2CV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen 2CV | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | 2CV | 6 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 2488 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 169 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1125 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 64 L |
