1968 Citroen 2CV vs. 2012 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2012 Ford Fusion is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Fusion (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1968 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Fusion should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Fusion weights approximately 930 kg more than 1968 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen 2CV | 2012 Ford Fusion | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | 2CV | Fusion |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4841 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1834 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1445 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2728 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 66 L |