1968 Citroen 2CV vs. 2012 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2012 Ford Mustang is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Mustang (412 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 394 more horse power than 1968 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1075 kg more than 1968 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen 2CV | 2012 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | 2CV | Mustang |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 412 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1635 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 61 L |