1968 Citroen 2CV vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1968 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 3 weights approximately 740 kg more than 1968 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen 2CV | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | 2CV | 3 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 55 L |