1968 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 1963 Ford Cortina
To start off, 1968 Citroen Ak 350 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Ford Cortina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ford Cortina (49 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ford Cortina should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Ak 350.
Because 1963 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Ak 350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Ford Cortina (90 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm). This means 1963 Ford Cortina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen Ak 350 | 1963 Ford Cortina | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | Ak 350 | Cortina |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 1198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 22 HP | 49 HP |
| Torque | 41 Nm | 90 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 50 L |
