1968 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 1995 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 1995 Jaguar XJS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Jaguar XJS (222 HP) has 200 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Ak 350.
Because 1995 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Ak 350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Ak 350 | 1995 Jaguar XJS | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | Ak 350 | XJS |
Year Released | 1968 | 1995 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 3980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 222 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 82 L |