1968 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2000 Jaguar F-Type is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 368 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Ak 350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 1195 kg more than 1968 Citroen Ak 350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Jaguar F-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar F-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Ak 350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Ak 350 | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | Ak 350 | F-Type |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 4194 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2390 mm |