1968 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2003 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Ak 350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1325 kg more than 1968 Citroen Ak 350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (319 Nm) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Ak 350 | 2003 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | Ak 350 | Ram |
Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 41 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 1930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 76 L |