1968 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2008 Volvo V70
To start off, 2008 Volvo V70 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Volvo V70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volvo V70 (235 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volvo V70 should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Ak 350.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo V70 (320 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2008 Volvo V70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Ak 350 | 2008 Volvo V70 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Ak 350 | V70 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 3201 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 41 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 60 L |