1968 Citroen Ami vs. 1960 Holden FC
To start off, 1968 Citroen Ami is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Holden FC would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Holden FC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Holden FC (62 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Ami. (29 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Holden FC should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Holden FC weights approximately 360 kg more than 1968 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Holden FC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Holden FC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Ami | 1960 Holden FC | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | Ami | FC |
Year Released | 1968 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 29 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2670 mm |