1968 Citroen Ami vs. 1966 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1968 Citroen Ami is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Falcon (106 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Ami. (29 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Falcon weights approximately 499 kg more than 1968 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Ami | 1966 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | Ami | Falcon |
Year Released | 1968 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2782 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 29 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1119 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 56 L |