1968 Citroen Ami vs. 1981 Zastava 750
To start off, 1981 Zastava 750 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 848 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 750 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 750 (33 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Ami. (29 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 750 should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Zastava 750 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1968 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Ami | 1981 Zastava 750 | |
Make | Citroen | Zastava |
Model | Ami | 750 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 29 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2010 mm |