1968 Citroen Ami vs. 1990 Nissan Micra
To start off, 1990 Nissan Micra is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 988 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Nissan Micra (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Ami. (29 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Nissan Micra weights approximately 46 kg more than 1968 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen Ami | 1990 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Citroen | Nissan |
| Model | Ami | Micra |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 29 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 666 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2310 mm |
