1968 Citroen Ami vs. 1997 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1997 Mazda Midge is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,322 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Ami. (29 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mazda Midge weights approximately 346 kg more than 1968 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen Ami | 1997 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | Ami | Midge |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 1322 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 29 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1400 mm |
