1968 Citroen Ami vs. 2000 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2000 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota RAV4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota RAV4 (146 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Ami. (29 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota RAV4 should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota RAV4 weights approximately 655 kg more than 1968 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota RAV4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota RAV4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Ami | 2000 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | Ami | RAV4 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 29 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 57 L |