1968 Citroen Ami vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,319 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (129 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Ami. (29 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo S60 weights approximately 779 kg more than 1968 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Ami | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Ami | S60 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 29 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1399 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 70 L |